Kumar

@here - How many of you are actually frustrated by how clay's action credits are getting consumed, even if am using my own APIs

Honest reflection after doing a podcast last month — The host titled it "AI Is Not Your GTM Strategy" And I keep thinking about how accurate that is right now. Everyone in this community is sharp. But I still see the same pattern everywhere — People automating before they've understood the market. I had a client. Skincare. Huge audience. Terrible sales conversion. The fix wasn't the tool. Wasn't the sequence. It was geography. They were targeting cities where their price point would never land. Found it in YouTube comments. Not in a dashboard. WhatsApp outreach. Not cold email. 45% jump in sales. The conversation is on Spotify if anyone wants the full breakdown — drop a comment and I'll share the link. Curious if others here are seeing the same thing — teams reaching for Clay before they've nailed ICP?

Hey folks! I'm Kumar — Head of AI Architect & GTM lead at WorkinX Digital, running my own automation practice (Dwary Intech) on the side. What I'm building right now:

My stack: n8n | Clay | Apollo | Vibe Prospecting | HubSpot | Salesforce | LangChain | Claude API | Python | React | Python | 6 sigma What I solve: GTM automation (lead gen, enrichment, outbound sequencing, CRM sync) Multi-agent systems (task decomposition, tool use, orchestration) Revenue operations (data cleanup, workflow automation, API integrations) Actively helping other teams by building GTM automation projects Multi-agent AI implementations CRM/sales workflow optimization Let us connect:

Based in New Delhi, flexible across AU/US/EU/Asia timezones. Actively open to learn and open to work! Cheers 🥂 (edited)