Hey Amirali N., took a look. Honestly the migration turned out clean - performance-wise it's solid and nothing looks "broken".
But since you asked for a roast:
Homepage:
The hero rotating text (Platforms / AI Agents / Recruitment / Sales) is doing too much. When someone lands they have ~3 seconds to get what you do and a cycling word means they might catch "Recruitment" when your strongest angle is probably "Platforms" or "AI Agents". I'd pick one primary message and let the sub-text handle the rest.
Your interactive "Try yourself now" demo is honestly the strongest conversion asset on the page - but it's buried below 2 full scroll-lengths of content. That thing should live way higher. Letting someone actually test your API before you pitch them on features is a massive trust builder, don't hide it.
The comparison table (you vs competitors) reads a bit aggressive with all the red "-" marks. The content is good but visually it feels like you're bashing rather than differentiating. A subtler approach - like showing what you offer without explicitly listing competitor flaws - tends to convert better. People don't trust companies that trash-talk.
Testimonials are too short to build real trust. "Lookalike algorithm is very precise" is nice but doesn't tell a story. Even one quote that says "we switched from X, enrichment accuracy went from 60% to 90%, saved us Y hours/week" would outperform all six current quotes combined.
The "Five ways to use" section - all five cards look identical in visual weight. If Platforms and AI Agents are your primary ICP, make those visually dominant. Right now a visitor can't tell which use case matters most.
CTA section at the bottom with team photos is great actually. Humanizes the product, I'd keep that.
Overall the design is clean and functional. Main thing is the information hierarchy - your best stuff (the live demo, the trust logos, the specific proof points) needs to surface higher. Good bones though, the Claude + Codex migration clearly worked.
