I’ve been heads-down building a RevOps Transformation Engine in Notion to solve the "dead-on-arrival" audit problem. It uses relational logic to link stakeholder pain points directly to executive health scores and budget waste. I’m currently looking for a few more RevOps peers to beta-test the architecture (using dummy data for now) and poke holes in the logic before I launch it on Linkedin next Tuesday. The Engine surfaces: Financial "Shelfware" Waste Operational Health Scores A 90-day Strategic Roadmap If anyone want to take a look "under the hood" link is in the comments.
Offer the link here without DMs 😎
Immediate feedback: this is too complex and introduces operational debt right out of the gate. An entire month to diagnose and action a resolution is an eon.
I think the 'Quick Start' timeline might be obscuring the actual architecture. The Engine isn't a new 30-day manual process—it's a relational pipeline designed to reduce debt. Here is the data flow: > You log a raw signal (a rep's pain or a seat-count leak). The Engine then automatically aggregates those signals into 'Patterns.' It moves the work from 'constant manual analysis' to 'automated synthesis.' You aren't managing the middle; the Engine is surfacing the middle for you. The goal is to move from a random list of tickets to a single dashboard that shows the CRO exactly where the financial and operational 'leak' is happening in real-time. That was the goal behind building this, does the concept of an automated synthesis layer change the 'operational debt' math for you?
Honestly, no. I'd imagine a loom of you working through it might help others.
thanks for the feedback. Will definitely create one and share.
This hits close to home. I’ve seen a lot of audits that look fine on paper but were basically dead the minute they got socialized. Curious how you’re tying the pain points to exec-level health without it turning into hand-wavy scoring. Happy to poke at it if you want another set of eyes.
Michael J. I hear you. 7/10 health means nothing to a CEO. My engine replaces 'hand-wavy' scoring with a direct lineage. Every audit item is anchored to a 'Voice of the Team' pain point and a calculated 'Time Tax.' The executive health bar isn't a manual guess; it’s a live rollup of whether those specific, documented obstacles have been audited and eliminated. We aren't reporting 'System Health'; we're reporting the % of operational friction removed. Link is in the thread above if you missed it, more eyes on it the better. Please poke around!
Michael J. Final testing on a new addition... KPI Metrics and Registry. Goal is to separate technical reliability from human consensus. Logic & Alignment Debt: The "People" layer Technical Debt: The "System" layer Data Trust Score: The Verdict. The bottom line: if the system is fixed but the people are still fighting over the math, we don't trust the number yet.
