Looking for Immediate Sales/RevOps/GTM Operators for New Project

Adam H. · 2026-01-09T14:40:46.155Z

Hey everyone — Adam here 👋 I’m launching a new revenue-focused project today and I’m looking for senior Sales / RevOps / GTM operators who are between projects and can move immediately. This is intentionally fast and execution-first: • Single same-day deep test (≈6 hours) • Clear go / no-go the same day • If it’s a fit: immediate launch and ownership Commission-based from day one, with real upside. No long interviews, no “let’s circle back”. If you’re available today and enjoy moving fast — DM me.

Looking for Immediate Sales/RevOps/GTM Operators for New Project | RevGenius

6 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

Oluwanifemi A.
·
·
This is refreshingly clear. Speed + revenue focus usually works best when positioning is already sharp, otherwise even great operators end up guessing instead of executing. Curious (if you can share): is this a new product finding GTM motion, or an existing offer that needs tighter revenue systems and messaging to scale fast? Love the no-theatre approach regardless. Hope you find the right operators quickly.
Adam H.
·
·
Good catch. The wording changed to reflect intent — this isn’t exploratory or “feel-it-out” work. It’s about seeing real execution under real constraints, fast. It’s an existing offer with signal already there. The gap is tighter GTM, revenue systems, and sharper messaging to scale without slowdown. The same-day deep test is just a way to remove guesswork quickly and see how someone actually operates when it matters. Appreciate the note — aligned on the importance of sharp positioning.
Oluwanifemi A.
·
·
That makes a lot of sense, once there’s signal, the biggest risk really is misalignment, not lack of effort. What I’ve seen kill momentum at this stage is when GTM execution is solid, but the story + positioning lag behind the revenue systems, so teams ship fast but slightly off-target. Most of my work sits right in that gap also, tightening the narrative, value hierarchy, and visual system so sales, marketing, and product are all pulling in the same direction under pressure, especially when speed matters. If you’re open to it, I’d be curious to look at how the offer is currently framed (landing page, deck, or sales copy) and share where clarity could unlock faster execution. Even a quick pass usually reveals where friction hides.
Adam H.
·
·
You’re pointing at the exact failure mode I’m trying to avoid. There intentionally isn’t a polished landing page or deck yet — not because it’s missing, but because I don’t want narrative to harden before the revenue system proves itself. Right now the signal I care about is: does execution + positioning snap into place under pressure, or drift once speed is introduced. If it’s useful, the way I’d involve you isn’t a “review assets” pass, but a fast framing pass before anything ships — pressure-testing the core narrative, value hierarchy, and what should be true before it’s made visible. If that kind of pre-surface alignment work is interesting, we can do a tight, same-day pass once there’s live signal to react to. If not, totally fine — just wanted to clarify how I’m thinking about sequencing.
Oluwanifemi A.
·
·
That framing actually resonates a lot. I agree, once narrative hardens too early, it becomes a liability instead of leverage. Pressure is the only honest validator.
Oluwanifemi A.
·
·
The pre-surface framing pass you described is exactly where I do my best work: clarifying what must be true before anything becomes visible, so speed doesn’t introduce drift. Less “polish,” more constraint-setting, what’s the irreducible promise, what gets deprioritized, and what the system should refuse to say even under pressure. A same-day pass reacting to live signal makes sense to me. That’s usually where weak hierarchies and fuzzy value claims show up fast. Happy to treat it as a working session rather than a deliverable, align the frame, stress-test it, and leave you with a sharper internal compass before anything ships. Whenever the signal feels strong enough to react to, I’m open to jumping in.

Oluwanifemi A.
·
·
This is refreshingly clear. Speed + revenue focus usually works best when positioning is already sharp, otherwise even great operators end up guessing instead of executing. Curious (if you can share): is this a new product finding GTM motion, or an existing offer that needs tighter revenue systems and messaging to scale fast? Love the no-theatre approach regardless. Hope you find the right operators quickly.
Adam H.
·
·
Good catch. The wording changed to reflect intent — this isn’t exploratory or “feel-it-out” work. It’s about seeing real execution under real constraints, fast. It’s an existing offer with signal already there. The gap is tighter GTM, revenue systems, and sharper messaging to scale without slowdown. The same-day deep test is just a way to remove guesswork quickly and see how someone actually operates when it matters. Appreciate the note — aligned on the importance of sharp positioning.
Oluwanifemi A.
·
·
That makes a lot of sense, once there’s signal, the biggest risk really is misalignment, not lack of effort. What I’ve seen kill momentum at this stage is when GTM execution is solid, but the story + positioning lag behind the revenue systems, so teams ship fast but slightly off-target. Most of my work sits right in that gap also, tightening the narrative, value hierarchy, and visual system so sales, marketing, and product are all pulling in the same direction under pressure, especially when speed matters. If you’re open to it, I’d be curious to look at how the offer is currently framed (landing page, deck, or sales copy) and share where clarity could unlock faster execution. Even a quick pass usually reveals where friction hides.
Adam H.
·
·
You’re pointing at the exact failure mode I’m trying to avoid. There intentionally isn’t a polished landing page or deck yet — not because it’s missing, but because I don’t want narrative to harden before the revenue system proves itself. Right now the signal I care about is: does execution + positioning snap into place under pressure, or drift once speed is introduced. If it’s useful, the way I’d involve you isn’t a “review assets” pass, but a fast framing pass before anything ships — pressure-testing the core narrative, value hierarchy, and what should be true before it’s made visible. If that kind of pre-surface alignment work is interesting, we can do a tight, same-day pass once there’s live signal to react to. If not, totally fine — just wanted to clarify how I’m thinking about sequencing.
Oluwanifemi A.
·
·
That framing actually resonates a lot. I agree, once narrative hardens too early, it becomes a liability instead of leverage. Pressure is the only honest validator.
Oluwanifemi A.
·
·
The pre-surface framing pass you described is exactly where I do my best work: clarifying what must be true before anything becomes visible, so speed doesn’t introduce drift. Less “polish,” more constraint-setting, what’s the irreducible promise, what gets deprioritized, and what the system should refuse to say even under pressure. A same-day pass reacting to live signal makes sense to me. That’s usually where weak hierarchies and fuzzy value claims show up fast. Happy to treat it as a working session rather than a deliverable, align the frame, stress-test it, and leave you with a sharper internal compass before anything ships. Whenever the signal feels strong enough to react to, I’m open to jumping in.