Damian O.

This is my POV: Clay is the modern GTM platform. It helps you do everything from enrichment to execution. No single data provider has 100% coverage, but Clay allows a user to build a logic flow: "First check ZoomInfo. If no email found, check Apollo. If no email found, check another, etc." This "Waterfall" approach maximizes data coverage and accuracy Apollo is good for enrichment (in the USA - not so good outside) and it is very good for sales teams that need to execute sequences. Clay is just starting with their campaign module, while Apollo has had it for a long time

I'm assuming that LinkedIn is already integrated to HockeyStack

Ok - this might be a longer chat and I would need to know much more about your current landscape, but.... The three platforms use different ideas of de-anonymizing, however, since you want to know the Target Account I would:

Very true 🙂 . Clay was our first integration, Apollo our second, so I get the value of both

I don't disagree with the learning curve Pat H. but I think it's: a) worth it b) to do a quick list building is very easy - what's difficult is the orchestration

Yes, they have a very nice waterfall model for enrichment

I was having the same conversation with my head of sales. He suggested something that had not crossed my mind: a fractional sales team. I have been talking to https://northpulsegtm.lovable.app and they have an interesting business model. Ping me if you want a warm intro. The team behind that agency is great

Hey Oliver, Peelio looks good. I'm wondering what's your use case for tracking the news for that number of companies? What are you doing with that info? Just curious

I prefer Clay over Apollo, and HubSpot free would work

Hey Jon, I've been testing some of the new comers and I really like Instantly and Lemlist Instantly. Why I like it? Simple, warms up your domain, gets your domain going Lemlist: Why I like it? complete, powerful, scalable