Thanks Nick — this is a great callout. Sorry for the delayed response.
What’s really happening is we’re validating *champions*, but not the **buying system** behind them.
One thing that might help is identifying the full buying group early (champion, economic buyer, procurement) and treating that as part of SQL qualification — not something discovered later.
From an analytics lens, the gap is that we rarely track this explicitly. A simple leading indicator like **% of opportunities with confirmed budget authority** can tell you a lot about pipeline quality *before* deals start stalling.
In a lot of cases, pipeline looks healthy — but a chunk of it was never truly closable to begin with.