Wole B.

Same observation Patrick A. 😅 😅 Some comments almost as long as the posts... Filled with those "Not because [ ], but because [ ]" gen AI sentences...

If you disagree, I'd love to learn from you too

I honestly believe these conversations are important for career insights and projection.

I noticed people naturally become defensive about this topic. It’s completely understandable. I stop myself from doing that too. It ain't fun hearing that a skill you spent years mastering 'may go extinct.' But from research I've done it's happened throughout history (it's just never happened this fast). Almost everyone in this community is currently doing a job that replaced someone else's 'old way.' The titles we hold onto today as our identity were the 'disruptors' a few years ago. Don't believe me?

I’m giving this context so we can free ourselves to evolve. Just as people did or didn't 20 to 40 years ago, we have two choices: learn the new systems, or let the market 'outgrow' us like it happened gradually to those from years ago we replaced.

Just like the 90s, history repeating itself... But faster

Exactly Ben B.

Jared R. AI is pretty good at numbers and structure, that's why coding was the first to 'go'. Any role that requires repetitive, data-heavy tasks will be higher on such lists. However the strategic architecture part of the role will remain very human. It's all down to each company's role requirements of RevOps

Can't say the same for UI design tho

Definitely 100% SDR, maybe not so much BRD for human connection JDs that require relationship building. I've personally built SDR agents and it works 200% better than a human physically could. Next on the list is likely RevOps. Others on the list will all be 'impacted' but can't be obsolete because they require judgement and taste.