Sai M.

Welcome Tanya, which stage of companies you are looking to work with? Startup’s with no gtm or companies with established gtm strategies?

Totally agree, Roozbeh — small tweaks make a huge difference. In our recent LinkedIn Signals app, we noticed a 0 → 75% jump in activation rate just by changing the phrasing from something generic like “LinkedIn URL” to a more action-oriented one like “Track the engagement of this LinkedIn URL.” It’s fascinating how such subtle language shifts can make users instantly understand the why behind the action.

Ishika, what’s working best now is starting with “trigger-based ICPs” instead of static profiles. For example: “companies recently funded + hiring SDRs + just launched on Product Hunt.” That stack signals both budget and urgency.

Great question, Jitesh. Voice AI tends to follow a 2–4 month cycle if the PoC is quick and ROI is visible early. The slowdown usually happens between demo and PoC as teams(especially large companies) need a lot of internal approvals

Rudy R. sent

We have built a LinkedIn signals application that’ll help you find your ICP who reacted or commented to LinkedIn posts that describe the problems solved by your company. Interested to try?

Niraj U. Based on my own experiences, I think the best approach would be to first do it yourself — figure out the sales process, learn what works, and refine it. Once you’ve done that, you can bring in a commission-only salesperson. The thing is, without any equity or fixed pay, most salespeople won’t go out of their way to hit targets. Their morale can drop if they don’t see quick results. You’ll end up spending time hiring, training, and then replacing them when they leave. So, it’s better to start by doing it yourself, build the playbook, and then bring in a commission-only salesperson. Since they don’t have real skin in the game, they’re not the right fit for figuring out your sales process from scratch.