Absolutely up my alley. The hardest part is usually not control design, itβs control mapping + evidence continuity across frameworks.
Most painful spots I keep seeing:
- 1.
Crosswalk ambiguity between NIST CSF, SOC 2, and ISO 27001
- 2.
βControl existsβ but evidence is non-auditable or scattered
- 3.
Ownership gaps (who attests, who remediates, who signs off)
- 4.
Gap assessments that identify issues but donβt prioritize by business risk/exposure
If youβre building this as an outbound wedge, the win is a decision-grade gap output:
why it matters (risk + commercial impact)
what to fix first in 30/60/90
Happy to compare notes async if useful.