We've been thinking a lot about customer personas. Most teams still segment customers by company size, industry, or ARR. But we've found that behavior often tells a much better story. Instead of "Enterprise Customer," you might have personas like:
The Renewal Pragmatist – focused on reducing risk before renewing.
The Feature-Driven Improver – always asking for new capabilities.
The Support-First Risk Manager – values fast issue resolution above all else.
The Usage Validator – wants proof through adoption and usage data.
The interesting part is these personas aren't fixed, they change as customer behavior changes. How does your team think about customer personas today? Are they static, or do they evolve based on customer signals?
I think you need to also view it the other way. Who are the skeptics and what are the skeptical about? End of every first meeting if a second meeting isn't scheudled it's always, "take it back to my team" So stop asking about decision makers, you aren't ever gonna get to them that soon. Instead ask the following. You can even tee it up. "Hey, I'm willing to bet after this call you're gonna go share this with your team? I am curious, who do you think will be the most skeptical person on the team and what would they be skeptical about?" Get the answer and then say, Ok, that makes sense, would it be helpful if I include ____ to help you address that? Hopefully I can help reduce you becoming a ping-pong ball." I teach this to every single client. And every time they are blown away by how much more real intelligence and info they get.
Both a good and interesting perspective, and you're right, personas will change (as will pressures bearing down on them). Two things, signals are possible to pick up on during pitches you can test. Soft closes another route, although much can be predicted 'before' the meeting with certain research techniques. Correct, they will no doubt want to take it back to the team, the objective being invited back with them.
