Comparing Apollo's New Features to Clay: Is It Better?

·

Hello everyone, Apollo also introduced waterfall enrichment and already has AI research option. Do you guys think it has become better than Clay now?

· Sorted by Oldest

Mike C.
·
·
Zero chance. Check out Airscale.io as someone you have to watch 😎 Victor
Aju N.
·
·
I have already tried it. It's not that great, very slow.
Aju N.
·
·
But yeah it's way cheaper than Clay
Aju N.
·
·
That's a good thing
Rex B.
·
·
If all you want is enrichment and AI research with a little control, that may be viable. But this is apples to oranges for my team & clients -> We use Clay as the orchestration layer for about 100 different functions with GTM data. Apollo can't touch that because they want to be where you do the work, whereas Clay for us is about where you orchestrate the work/data.
Sai M.
·
·
You need to a prompt engineer to get the apollo.io research agent to fetch the right results 🙂 i had tough time getting apollo research to find what i want clay is much better

Mike C.
·
·
Zero chance. Check out Airscale.io as someone you have to watch 😎 Victor
Aju N.
·
·
I have already tried it. It's not that great, very slow.
Aju N.
·
·
But yeah it's way cheaper than Clay
Aju N.
·
·
That's a good thing
Rex B.
·
·
If all you want is enrichment and AI research with a little control, that may be viable. But this is apples to oranges for my team & clients -> We use Clay as the orchestration layer for about 100 different functions with GTM data. Apollo can't touch that because they want to be where you do the work, whereas Clay for us is about where you orchestrate the work/data.
Sai M.
·
·
You need to a prompt engineer to get the apollo.io research agent to fetch the right results 🙂 i had tough time getting apollo research to find what i want clay is much better