How Are Apollo Users Adjusting Workflows After LinkedIn Automation Changes?

·Mar 03, 2026 11:20 AM·

Curious to hear from other Apollo users out there -- how are you adjusting workflows in response to changes in how they support LinkedIn workflows? They recently dropped automation of connection requests (and I believe messaging as well?), making multi channel sequences a lot more manual to execute. Basically we can do all the same things, but it will require a lot more keystrokes and mouse clicks. Has anyone found a workaround?

7 comments

· Sorted by Oldest

Pat H.
·
·
Maybe stop the automated requests and be more targeted 😎 or use HeyReach
Patrick A.
·
·
What pat said.
daan m.
·
·
Yeah they did it for a reason, so also what Pat Said
John T.
·
·
Paul B. I use la growth machine for multichannel automations. Plenty of tools out there that do the same thing though (lemlist too maybe?) Some people are very against automated outreach but I think it is just necessary to develop consistent pipeline without wasting time doing manual work over and over
👍1
Paul B.
·
·
Of course they did it for a reason -- they're a public company under pressure to squeeze revenue. Every move LinkedIn has made, little or big, is slowly strangling the oxygen out of organic marketing on the platform, in pursuit of a higher ARPU. As much as I would like to use tools that are purpose-built for my needs, idealism doesn't really move the needle on my KPIs. So like a lot of growth marketers, I'm trying to get whatever value I can out of this, without asking for budget. Feels like a pretty common use case? Pat H. I'm curious how HeyReach (the self-described "LinkedIn Automation Tool For Agencies, Sales & Growth teams" would be different?
Pat H.
·
·
I actually do not know as I've not used it, I would recommend the former of my statement above.
Jared R.
·
·
adding in Nick S.